Research Output

Can pay, should pay? Comparing employer and student outcomes of paid and unpaid work opportunities.

  This paper looks across and beyond this project to examine the range of placement and work experience forms currently experienced by computing students, and asks the question – are all of these opportunities equal? Or more specifically, are the benefits and outcomes of equal worth? This paper explores some of the outcomes of paid and unpaid work in the ICT sector from both student and employer perspectives. Read More: http://journals.heacademy.ac.uk/doi/full/10.11120/stem.hea.2013.0025

  • Publication Status:

    Published

  • Publisher

    Higher Education Academy

  • DOI:

    10.11120/stem.hea.2013.0025

  • Library of Congress:

    HD Industries. Land use. Labor

  • Dewey Decimal Classification:

    331 Labor economics

Citation

Smith, C. F., Smith, S. & Irving, C. (2013). Can pay, should pay? Comparing employer and student outcomes of paid and unpaid work opportunities. In Proceedings of the HEA STEM Learning and Teaching Conference (2013): Where practice and pedagogy meet, 114-119. doi:10.11120/stem.hea.2013.0025

Authors

Keywords

e-Placement Scotland; work experience; employment opportunities; paid placement; work-based learning;

Monthly Views:

Available Documents