Research Output
Measuring Concordance in Clinical Practice
  This article describes the construction of a tool to measure concordance in clinical practice. The second of two parts, it details the strategic background underpinning concordance and expands the rationale as this relates to the construction of individual items within the evaluation tool used and described. Cribb (2011) considers that while policy drivers extol the rhetoric of shared decision-making and person-centred care, the application of this is complex. Cribb's thesis is summarised to show that the evaluation tool is grounded in the right type of evidence to support the facilitation of concordance in clinical practice.

  • Type:

    Article

  • Date:

    31 December 2012

  • Publication Status:

    Published

  • Publisher

    Mark Allen Healthcare

  • DOI:

    10.12968/bjmh.2012.1.2.88

  • ISSN:

    2049-5919

  • Library of Congress:

    RM Therapeutics. Pharmacology

  • Dewey Decimal Classification:

    615 Pharmacology and therapeutics

Citation

Barron, D. T., & Snowden, A. (2012). Measuring Concordance in Clinical Practice. British Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 1, 88-94. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjmh.2012.1.2.88

Authors

Keywords

Concordance; clinical practice; evaluation tool; person-centred care;

Monthly Views:

Available Documents