Research Output

The limitations of a somatics of resistance: sexual performativity and gender dissidence in Dickens’s Dombey and Son.

  This essay considers some of the implications of a critical turn from a concern with a 'political technology of the body' in the Foucauldian sense to one with embodied micropractices. I will contend here that a critique of social experiences that is conceptualised through attention to individualised, or intersubjective, corporeal practices, is necessarily limited. A critical focus on the affective or performative self potentially colludes with a political agenda that privileges the bourgeois concept of individuality over that of collectivity, and performative micropractices over the transformation of social relationships on a structural level. This article approaches these issues by investigating two forms of sexual deviance, enacted by the figures of Paul and Edith Dombey, in Dombey and Son - a text that explores the problematic of nineteenthcentury gender-specific discipline and resistance, but also a narrative that points to the conceptual limitations resulting from individualised notions of embodiment and embodied resistance. I will suggest that this novel codes Paul and Edith's resistance to Dombey's regime of gender-discipline as specifically physical and sexualised forms of deviance.

  • Type:

    Article

  • Date:

    01 August 2005

  • Publication Status:

    Published

  • Publisher

    Berghahn Journals

  • DOI:

    10.3167/001115705781004514

  • ISSN:

    0011-1570

  • Library of Congress:

    PN0080 Criticism

  • Dewey Decimal Classification:

    305 Social groups

Citation

Schwan, A. (2005). The limitations of a somatics of resistance: sexual performativity and gender dissidence in Dickens’s Dombey and Son. Critical Survey. 17, 92-106. doi:10.3167/001115705781004514. ISSN 0011-1570

Authors

Keywords

political technology of the body; sexual deviance; embodiment; physical deviance; social relationships; Dombey and Son;

Available Documents