Research Output
Apple and Starbucks could have avoided being hacked if they'd taken this simple step
  Apple and Starbucks are two of the world’s most trusted companies, but their reputations were recently tarnished thanks to some novice cybersecurity mistakes. Both setup systems that could have allowed hackers to break into customers' accounts by repeatedly trying different passwords, a procedure commonly known as a “brute force” attack. The mistake both firms made was in not employing the simple tactic of automatically locking accounts after several failed attempts to enter a password. Last week it was revealed such tactics allowed thieves to steal money from users of Starbucks' mobile app. In 2014, an investigation around the publishing of nude photos of celebrities taken from their iCloud storage accounts, identified that intruders could access Apple’s Find My iPhone app by continually trying different login details. In order to protect against this type of attack, many sites block login after a given number of incorrect attempts. The system can then go into a permanent lock-out mode (where the user must perform a lock-out procedure, such as calling the hosting company to verify their account), or lock out for a given time (known as the hold-down time).

  • Type:

    Newspaper Article

  • Date:

    19 May 2015

  • Publication Status:

    Published

  • Library of Congress:

    QA76 Computer software

  • Dewey Decimal Classification:

    005.8 Data security

Citation

Buchanan, W. J. (2015). Apple and Starbucks could have avoided being hacked if they'd taken this simple step

Authors

Keywords

Apple; Starbucks; cybersecurity; brute force attack; password lockout;

Monthly Views:

Available Documents