Research Output

The Ethics of Engagement in an Age of Austerity: A Paradox Perspective

  Our contribution in this paper is to highlight the ethical implications of workforce engagement strategies in an age of austerity. Hard or instrumentalist approaches to workforce engagement create the potential for situations where engaged employees are expected to work ever longer and harder with negative outcomes for their well-being. Our study explores these issues in an investigation of the enactment of an engagement strategy within a UK Health charity, where managers and workers face paradoxical demands to raise service quality and cut costs. We integrate insights from engagement, paradox, and ethic of care literatures, to explore these paradoxical demands—illustrating ways in which engagement experiences become infused with tensions when the workforce faces competing requirements to do 'more with less' resources. We argue that those targeted by these paradoxical engagement strategies need to be supported and cared for, embedded in an ethic of care that provides explicit workplace resources for helping workers and managers cope with and work through corresponding tensions. Our study points to the critical importance of support from senior and frontline managers for open communications and dialogue practices.

  • Type:


  • Date:

    13 August 2018

  • Publication Status:


  • Publisher

    Springer Nature America, Inc

  • DOI:


  • Cross Ref:


  • ISSN:


  • Library of Congress:

    HD28 Management. Industrial Management

  • Dewey Decimal Classification:

    658 General management

  • Funders:

    Edinburgh Napier Funded


Francis, H., & Keegan, A. (2018). The Ethics of Engagement in an Age of Austerity: A Paradox Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 1, doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3976-1



Engagement, ethic of care, paradox ,

Monthly Views:

Available Documents

  • pdf

    The Ethics Of Engagement In An Age Of Austerity: a paradox perspective


    © The Author(s) 2018
    Open Access
    This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

  • Downloadable citations