Research Output
What's in a name? Concordance is better than adherence for promoting partnership and self-management of chronic disease.
  The choice of language health professionals use to discuss self-management of chronic disease is important and influences patients’ self-management. The words compliance, adherence and concordance are used to discuss patients’ agreement with prescribed treatment plans, but have different tone and meanings. Models of care linked to the words compliance and adherence are underpinned by interactions between patients and healthcare providers that merely reinforce instructions about treatments. The ‘patient-professional partnership’ is introduced as a model by Bodenheimer et al. (2002, p. 2469) whereby true partnership working should be an opportunity to pool the expertise of both parties to arrive at mutually agreed goals in concordance. The impact these words might have on partnership working is important in defining the patient–health professional relationship, and for the patients’ healthcare outcomes and the potential effect on healthcare utilisation.

  • Type:

    Article

  • Date:

    06 May 2016

  • Publication Status:

    Published

  • Publisher

    CSIRO Publishing

  • DOI:

    10.1071/py15140

  • Cross Ref:

    PY15140

  • ISSN:

    1448-7527

  • Library of Congress:

    RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine

  • Dewey Decimal Classification:

    613 Personal health & safety

Citation

Randall, S., & Neubeck, L. (2016). What's in a name? Concordance is better than adherence for promoting partnership and self-management of chronic disease. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 22(3), 181-184. https://doi.org/10.1071/py15140

Authors

Keywords

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health; Health Policy

Monthly Views:

Available Documents